16 July 2005

Legislative regular session wrapup and governor's score

By the same methodology used in the last post, we can also grade the performance of Gov. Kathleen Blanco, with one assumption. For 19 of the votes, since she signed them she clearly was in support of them, and not in support of the one she vetoed, HB 415. We must assume she supported neither of the amendments to HB 1 also listed in the index.

Therefore, Blanco scored a 42, right around the Democrat average for the Legislature. Not only can she not be called atypical of state Democrats, she can’t even be called a conservative Democrat, according to this analysis.

15 July 2005

Legislative regular session wrapup and legislator scores

As indicated previously, of the good and bad bills selected for observation in the 2005 Regular Legislative Session of the Louisiana Legislature, 20 made it all the way to the governor who signed them all except HB 415 (see below). By category, and with a brief description, they are:

THE GOOD
HB 242 – places small but additional restrictions on abortion
HB 311 – makes for a thriftier state employee retirement system
HB 386 – lops off unneeded government agencies
HB 415 – rids the state of a costly, low-turnout January local election date
HB 654 – provides funds for I-49
SB 44 – places tighter controls on vehicle purchases by state officials
SB 53 – attempts to allow Louisiana federal elections to occur with the rest of the nation’s
SB 146 – slightly limits students’ access to junk foods at school
SB 323 – reforms indigent defense in the state

THE BAD
HB 21 – allows payment to members of the Allen Parish Tourism Commission
HB 219 – allows an additional surcharge on motor vehicle offices transactions
HB 560 – reduces the amount of information provided by the governor on her budget
HB 631 – corporate welfare for the sound recording industry
HB 731 – corporate welfare for the motion picture industry
HB 763 – places a floor on gasoline retail prices
HB 887 – sick tax of 1.5% on hospital revenues
SB 47 – empowers the Morehouse Parish Lake Commission to gather money to build another useless lake
SB 190 – makes into law state the standard that poor people get free medical care, everybody else has to spend almost everything they have first into order to get it
SB 246 – corporate welfare for the rubber manufacturing industry
SB 341 – corporate welfare for the interactive digital media industry

In addition, there is one other vote of overriding importance. That was Republican-sponsored amendments to provide pay raises for educators without raising taxes. This was not one of the bills tracked in the Log since HB 1 is impossible to evaluate as a whole and passes usually close to unanimously. The devil is in the details for sure here, and these amendments in each chamber really spell out the priorities of legislators.

Altogether, this provides 21 votes on which to assess the performance of each legislator. However, some are more important than others, so, in my own judgment, I have devised a weighing where the educator pay vote is worth 6, four next most important votes are worth 4, the four next most important 3, the four next most important 2, and the eight least important worth one. Here’s is the way I judge the importance of these votes:

6X – vote #145 on Tucker amendment or vote #968 on Schedler amendment
4X – HB 887, HB 242, HB 311, HB 763
3X – SB 654, HB 386, SB 44, HB 219
2X – SB 323, SB 47, HB 560, HB 415
1X – HB 631, HB 731, SB 246, SB 53, SB 146, SB 190, SB 341, HB 21

So from this, an index may be constructed for each legislator where a maximum score of 100 means a legislator has voted in the best interests of the state’s people on every key vote while a 0 means voting against the state’s people’s best interests on every occasion. Absent votes for bills are counted as “no” votes (because an absence is treated as a “no” vote), so they have a negative impact on votes for good bills but a positive impact for votes on bad bills. Scores are computed from the last vote for final passage in the chamber.

Some interesting things to note on this list reproduced below:
  • I am a stern taskmasker, so the top scorers in each chamber, Rep. Ernie Alexander and Sen. Max Malone, are not close to scoring perfectly
  • Partisans tend to vote alike, particularly in the Senate. The typical House Republican averages 64.4 while the typical House Democrat averages 43.3; the typical Senate Republican averages 59.9 while the typical Senate Democrat averages 40.4
  • Thus, the typical senator (47.6) is more liberal than the typical representative (51.6), while the typical Republican scores about a 63 and the typical Democrat about a 42.
  • In the House, only four Republicans fell below the score of 50 while just one did so in the Senate. The two real outliers, Rep. Tom McVea and Sen. Sherri Cheek, are so out of step with their Republican counterparts that it begs the question whether they really are Republicans
  • In the House, of the 18 presumed “conservative” Democrats (defined as those who scored 50 or better), only six are not term-limited for 2007, while two of the four presumed “liberal” Republicans (defined as those who scored below 50) are – assuming that incumbency has helped keep these people in office and that voters will seek replacements that are more ideologically consistent with their labels, the GOP can expect a 10-seat pickup in the House in 2007
  • Using the same logic in the Senate, there is no change as the three “misplaced” senators will still be eligible to run in 2007

    Finally, the list (excuse the formatting which is difficult to transfer to the blog format; the first set are House members, the second set the senators):

    Name Party Score
    Alexander Republican 80
    Scalise Republican 76
    Erdey Republican 74
    Pitre Republican 74
    White Republican 74
    Bowler Republican 72
    Katz Republican 72
    Strain Republican 72
    Waddell Republican 72
    Winston Republican 72
    Burns Republican 70
    Greene Republican 70
    Powell, M Republican 70
    Trahan Republican 70
    Walsworth Republican 70
    Crowe Republican 68
    Dove Republican 68
    Geymann Republican 68
    LaBruzzo Republican 68
    Kleckley Republican 66
    Lambert Republican 66
    Smith, JH Republican 66
    Baudoin Democrat 64
    Bruneau Republican 64
    Schneider Republican 64
    Smiley Republican 64
    Tucker Republican 64
    Hebert Democrat 62
    Daniel Democrat 60
    Fannin Democrat 60
    Frith Democrat 60
    Martiny Republican 60
    Beard Republican 58
    Downs Republican 58
    Faucheux Democrat 58
    Smith, G Democrat 58
    Wright Democrat 58
    Kennard Republican 56
    Lancaster Republican 56
    Morrish Democrat 56
    Robideaux Independent 56
    Walker Democrat 56
    Durand Democrat 54
    Hopkins Democrat 54
    LaFleur Democrat 54
    Bruce Democrat 52
    Powell, T Republican 52
    Ansardi Democrat 50
    Curtis Democrat 50
    Johns Republican 50
    St. Germain Democrat 50
    Triche Democrat 50
    Hutter Republican 48
    Salter Democrat 48
    Thompson Democrat 48
    Toomy Republican 48
    Baldone Democrat 46
    Carter, R Democrat 46
    Crane Republican 46
    Cravins,Jr. Democrat 46
    Damico Democrat 46
    Dartez Democrat 46
    Hunter Democrat 46
    Kenney Democrat 46
    Pierre Democrat 46
    Ritchie Democrat 46
    Romero, R Democrat 46
    Smith. JD Democrat 46
    Cazayoux Democrat 44
    Farrar Democrat 44
    Glover Democrat 44
    McDonald Democrat 44
    Smith, JR Democrat 44
    Burrell Democrat 42
    Guillory, E Democrat 42
    Morrell Democrat 42
    Barrow Democrat 40
    Baylor Democrat 40
    Jackson, M Democrat 40
    Jefferson Democrat 40
    Townsend Democrat 40
    Badon Democrat 38
    Dorsey Democrat 38
    Gray Democrat 38
    Hammett Democrat 38
    Heaton Democrat 38
    Honey Democrat 38
    McVea Republican 38
    Quezaire Democrat 38
    Wooton Democrat 38
    Alario Democrat 36
    Carter, K Democrat 36
    Guillory, M Democrat 36
    LaFonta Democrat 36
    Marchand Democrat 36
    Odinet Democrat 36
    Hill Democrat 34
    DeWitt Democrat 32
    Doerge Democrat 32
    Gallot Democrat 32
    Montgomery Democrat 32
    Pinac Democrat 32
    Richmond Democrat 32
    Arnold Democrat 30

    Malone Republican 76
    Romero, C Republican 74
    Dardenne Republican 72
    Boasso Republican 66
    Barham Republican 64
    Schedler Republican 64
    Michot Republican 60
    Cain Republican 58
    Marionneaux Democrat 58
    Theunissen Republican 58
    Lentini Republican 56
    Amedee Democrat 54
    Fontenot Republican 52
    Hollis Republican 50
    Kostelka Republican 50
    Adley Democrat 48
    Chaisson Democrat 46
    Gautreaux,N Democrat 44
    Duplessis Democrat 42
    Dupre Democrat 42
    Heitmeier Democrat 42
    Murray Democrat 42
    Smith, M Democrat 42
    Ullo Democrat 42
    Cravins,Sr. Democrat 40
    Gautreaux,B Democrat 40
    Nevers Democrat 40
    Bajoie Democrat 38
    Cheek Republican 38
    Ellington Democrat 38
    McPherson Democrat 38
    Jackson, L Democrat 36
    Broome Democrat 34
    Fields Democrat 34
    Hines Democrat 34
    Jones Democrat 34
    Mount Democrat 34
    Shepherd Democrat 28
  • 26 June 2005

    Legislative regular session through 6/24/05

    The next edition of the log will come out in about two weeks to summarize which bills were enacted or vetoed and (which has seldom happened) whether an override will be attempted of any vetoes of these bills.

    THIS WEEK FOR THE GOOD: HB 242 passed Senate committee with minor amendments, passed the Senate 35-0, was rejected in the House, was passed out of conference and passed by the House 80-16; HB 311 was signed by the governor to become Act 75; HB 386 had the House concur with Senate amendments 101-0; HB 415 was reconsidered and passed by the Senate 21-10; SB 146 passed the House 92-2 and the Senate concurred with amendments 35-3; SB 323 had the Senate concur with House amendments 38-0;

    THIS WEEK FOR THE BAD: HB 21 was signed by the governor to become Act 33; HB 219 passed the Senate 22-13 and the House concurred with its amendments 80-17; HB 631 passed the Senate with major amendments 37-0, the House rejected it 97-5, the House passed the conference bill 98-0, and the Senate concurred 37-1; HB 763 had the House concur with Senate amendments 101-0; HB 799 failed to pass the Senate 8-29; SB 47 passed the House 101-0 and the Senate concurred with its amendments 36-0; SB 190 was signed by the governor to become Act 128; SB 246 passed the House 101-0 and the Senate concurred with its amendments 38-0; SB 341 passed the House 98-0 and the Senate concurred with its amendments 38-0.

    SCORECARD:
    Total House introductions: 877; Total Senate introductions: 352

    Total House good bills: 41; Total Senate good bills: 22

    Total House bad bills: 48; Total Senate bad bills: 19

    Total House good bills heard in committee: 27; Total Senate good bills heard in committee: 19

    Total House bad bills heard in committee: 35; Total Senate bad bills heard in committee: 12

    Total House good bills passing committee: 9; Total Senate good bills passing committee: 7

    Total House bad bills passing committee: 14; Total Senate bad bills passing committee: 8

    Total House good bills passing House: 7; Total Senate good bills passing Senate: 5

    Total House bad bills passing House: 9; Total Senate bad bills passing Senate: 6

    Total House good bills heard in Senate committee: 7; Total Senate good bills heard in House committee: 5

    Total House bad bills heard in Senate committee: 9; Total Senate bad bills heard in House committee: 6

    Total House good bills passing Senate committee: 5; Total Senate good bills passing House committee: 4

    Total House bad bills passing Senate committee: 8; Total Senate bad bills passing House committee: 4

    Total House good bills passing Senate: 5; Total Senate good bills passing House: 4

    Total House bad bills passing Senate: 5; Total bad Senate bills passing House: 4

    Total House good bills sent to governor: 5; Total Senate good bills sent to governor: 4

    Total House bad bills sent to governor: 5; Total Senate bad bills sent to governor: 4

    Total House good bills signed into law: 0; Total Senate good bills signed into law: 1

    Total House bad bills signed into law: 1; Total Senate bad bills signed into law: 1

    18 June 2005

    Legislative regular session through 6/17/05

    THIS WEEK FOR THE GOOD: HB 242 passed the House 99-0 with significant amendments and passed Senate committee; HB 386 passed Senate committee with minor amendments and passed the Senate 36-0; HB 415 passed Senate committee but failed to pass the Senate 12-24; HB 613 failed to pass Senate committee; HB 654 passed the Senate 37-1; HB 712 passed committee with minor amendments; SB 44 passed the House 97-2; SB 53 passed the House 66-31 and the Senate concurred 36-0; SB 323 was passed with amendments by the House 96-0.

    THIS WEEK FOR THE BAD: HB 275 was involuntarily deferred in committee; HB 317 failed to pass the House 43-55; HB 560 passed Senate committee and passed the Senate 36-0; HB 583 passed committee 14-0 and failed to pass the House 24-60; HB 631 passed the House 98-0 and passed Senate committee with minor amendments; HB 688 failed to pass the House 26-71; HB 731 passed Senate committee with minor amendments and passed the Senate 38-0; HB 763 passed the Senate 33-5; HB 799 passed Senate committee with minor amendments; HB 887 passed Senate committee with minor amendments, passed the Senate 26-11, and was concurred with by the House 72-27; SB 47 passed with minor amendments House committee 6-0; SB 190 was passed by the House 96-0 and was concurred by the Senate 38-0; SB 246 was passed with minor amendments by House committee 15-0; SB 341 was passed with minor amendments by House committee 15-0.

    SCORECARD:
    Total House introductions: 877; Total Senate introductions: 352

    Total House good bills: 41; Total Senate good bills: 22

    Total House bad bills: 48; Total Senate bad bills: 19

    Total House good bills heard in committee: 27; Total Senate good bills heard in committee: 19

    Total House bad bills heard in committee: 35; Total Senate bad bills heard in committee: 12

    Total House good bills passing committee: 9; Total Senate good bills passing committee: 7

    Total House bad bills passing committee: 14; Total Senate bad bills passing committee: 8

    Total House good bills passing House: 7; Total Senate good bills passing Senate: 5

    Total House bad bills passing House: 9; Total Senate bad bills passing Senate: 6

    Total House good bills heard in Senate committee: 7; Total Senate good bills heard in House committee: 5

    Total House bad bills heard in Senate committee: 9; Total Senate bad bills heard in House committee: 6

    Total House good bills passing Senate committee: 5; Total Senate good bills passing House committee: 4

    Total House bad bills passing Senate committee: 7; Total Senate bad bills passing House committee: 4

    Total House good bills passing Senate: 3; Total Senate good bills passing House: 3

    Total House bad bills passing Senate: 5; Total bad Senate bills passing House: 1

    Total House good bills sent to governor: 1; Total Senate good bills sent to governor: 2

    Total House bad bills sent to governor: 3; Total Senate bad bills sent to governor: 1

    17 June 2005

    Floor action, Jun. 17: SB 323; HB 415 & HB 613

    DID YOU KNOW?
    SB 323 introduces some limited reforms to indigent defense in Louisiana. It mainly is structural in terms of the process, not fiscal in nature (which is where the much greater reform is needed). But a big question came to the fore on the floor about how the bill would have a potentially large fiscal impact.

    Rep. Troy Hebert offered an amendment to take the $35 fee to fund indigent defense out of speeding tickets, saying the average court cost in Louisiana already was $176. He pointed out that the $35 was discretionary for smaller court jurisdictions. But Rep. Shirley Bowler pointed out that there was a minimum fee of $17.50 for all moving violations, so that actually might detract from total funding of indigent defense. The resulting confusion sent the bill back to the calendar and Hebert back to the drawing board for his amendment.

    Later, Hebert proposed an altered amendment which simply would exclude the previous entities (mayor’s courts, Jonesville, and Plaquemines) from having to charge the fee of $35. The rationale was that most of their business was minor or non-moving violations of vehicles. It was amended without objection, and the bill passed 96-0. Of course, now the Senate must agree to those changes before it can become law and start the first step to sensible reform of the indigent defense system.

    DID YOU KNOW?
    HB 415 went down in flames in the Senate. The bill is an attempt to save money by canceling only the January election opportunity for local governments. There remain five others. Yet it hardly garnered any discussion and failed 12-24. It remains on the calendar, but it is unlikely ever to see the light of day during this session.

    Also, an attempt was made to resurrect HB 613 in the Senate. The bill looks to set up a limited voucher system that essentially would apply to Orleans Parish schools. This was because the Senate Education did not have a definitive vote on it, so Senate rules allow the measure to be brought directly to the floor. Moreso than the content of the bill, senators argued about whether this move, which is permitted, was appropriate in bypassing a Senate committee. On a nearly party-line vote, it failed 10-23.

    QUOTES OF THE DAY
    “I don’t know … if you can give me a minute I can make something up.”
    Rep. Danny Martiny, handling SB 323, to Hebert on a question about why the $35 fee to fund indigent defense had been extended to the previously-exempt courts.

    “I hope everybody can hear me …”
    Rep. Tim Burns on HB 759 which concerns hearing-aid dealers, proving once again that one can overuse a punchline to the point of annoyance.

    “What we really need to do is to get you all a listening school, we really need that. I think I’ll be joining you.”
    Hebert during repartee around HB 883 which establishes polysomnography as a separate profession

    “Couldn’t we just use one of those Bruneau moves for this legislation?”
    Rep. John Alario, when Rep. Bryant Hammett had asked to suspend the rules to push forward consideration on a bill, referring to how last week Rep. Peppi Bruneau had resurrected an apparently dead HB 80.