29 June 2013

Legislative regular session rankings, 2013

And so the session is complete, save an unprecedented and would be miraculous veto override session being called. Thus, it’s time to compute the voting scorecard for the 2013 session. Twelve issues were selected and weighed for computation, all but two having been voted upon in both chambers. These were chosen mostly from the watch list compiled throughout the session, along with others of some importance. For a bill’s vote(s) to be selected, in both chambers there had to be more than one legislator not voting for the winning or losing side.

Being that passage of bills depends upon the seated membership of a body, not voting is counted as a negative vote. However, if a legislator had a leave of absence granted for that day, his absent votes weren’t counted for bills voted on that day and the score adjusted to take that into account.

Here are the bills with votes for final passage in every case on which the scorecard was computed, with the conservative/reform position and the weighing indicated:

BOTH CHAMBERS
HB 8keeps criminals from targeting defenseless households by prohibiting publishing whether an address was associated with a concealed carry permit; a conservative/reform vote is for (10 percent)

HB 111 – would have expanded marginally no smoking areas to within 25 feet of entrances to many state-owned buildings; a conservative/reform vote is for (5 percent)

HB 174 – permits generous salary increases to the generous salaries to elected clerks of court in times of tight budgets; a conservative/reform vote is against (10 percent)

HB 532 – amends the Constitution to allow for increased hospital fees to be charged and passed on indirectly to consumers so the state can draw more Medicaid money; a conservative/reform vote is against (5 percent)

HB 533 – amends the Constitution to decrease budgetary flexibility and make higher education and certain medical providers more vulnerable to cuts; a conservative/reform vote is against (5 percent)

HB 653 – reduces on-time payment bonus for retailers forced to collect state sales taxes that may be passed on to consumers; a conservative/reform vote is against (10 percent)

HB 703 – creates an arbitrary employment qualification burden by requiring some employees but not others to have a Louisiana driver’s license and car registration; a conservative/reform vote is against (5 percent)

SB 61 – excepts certain elected officials needlessly from some ethics laws; a conservative/reform vote is against (10 percent)

SB 63 – permits generous salary increases to elected assessors in times of tight budgets; a conservative/reform vote is against (10 percent)

SB 90 – increases women’s protection when they undergo abortion; a conservative/reform vote is for (10 percent)

SB 117 – would have created a body to formulate performance-based standards for higher education; a conservative/reform vote is for (10 percent)

HOUSE ONLY
HB 233 – would have expanded Medicaid eligibility that compared to current policy would have increased taxpayer costs and reduced outcome quality; a conservative/reform vote is against (10 percent)

SENATE ONLY
SB 259 – would have put the state firefighters’ pension system on more solid footing; a conservative/reform vote is for (10 percent)

Running the numbers, here are the 2013 Louisiana Legislature Log voting scores, beginning with the House:

Ivey
100
Republican
Simon
95
Republican
Whitney
90
Republican
Hodges
85
Republican
Connick
80
Republican
Stokes
80
Republican
Fannin
75
Democrat
Greene
75
Republican
Landry, N
75
Republican
Burns, T
70
Republican
Carter
70
Republican
Cromer
70
Republican
Geymann
70
Republican
Hollis
70
Republican
Kleckley
70
Republican
Ponti
70
Republican
Talbot
70
Republican
Champagne
67
Republican
Seabaugh
65
Republican
Adams
65
Republican
Bishop, S
65
Republican
Burns, H
65
Republican
Garafalo
65
Republican
Harris
65
Republican
Lorusso
65
Republican
Miller
65
Republican
Morris, Jim
65
Republican
Wilmott
65
Republican
Barras
60
Republican
Dove
60
Republican
Foil
60
Republican
Hensgens
60
Republican
Lopinto
60
Republican
Morris, Jay
60
Republican
Pearson
60
Republican
Richard
60
Independent
Robideaux
60
Republican
Schroder
56
Republican
Abramson
55
Democrat
Billiot
55
Democrat
Broadwater
55
Republican
Burford
55
Republican
Carmody
55
Republican
Chaney
55
Republican
Armes
50
Democrat
Hoffman
50
Republican
Pugh
50
Republican
Thibaut
50
Democrat
Henry
50
Republican
Badon
45
Democrat
Danahay
45
Democrat
Harrison
45
Republican
Havard
45
Republican
Leger
45
Democrat
Leopold
45
Republican
Pope
45
Republican
Pylant
45
Republican
Thompson
45
Republican
Guinn
40
Republican
Hazel
40
Republican
Lambert
40
Republican
Shadoin
40
Republican
Huval
39
Republican
Berthelot
35
Republican
Bishop, W
35
Democrat
Brown, Terry
35
Independent
Gisclair
35
Democrat
Howard
35
Republican
Jones
35
Democrat
Mack
35
Republican
Schexnayder
35
Republican
Norton
30
Democrat
Ortego
30
Democrat
Guillory, M
26
Democrat
Anders
25
Democrat
Arnold
25
Democrat
Cox
25
Democrat
Dixon
25
Democrat
Edwards
25
Democrat
Hill
25
Democrat
Honore
25
Democrat
James
25
Democrat
LeBas
25
Democrat
Moreno
25
Democrat
Reynolds
25
Democrat
Ritchie
25
Democrat
Smith
25
Democrat
St. Germain
25
Democrat
Williams, P.
25
Democrat
Jackson, G
21
Democrat
Jackson, K
20
Democrat
Johnson
20
Democrat
Montoucet
20
Democrat
Pierre
20
Democrat
Barrow
15
Democrat
Brossett
15
Democrat
Burrell
15
Democrat
Franklin
15
Democrat
Gaines
15
Democrat
Hunter
15
Democrat
Jefferson
15
Democrat
Price
15
Democrat
Thierry
11
Democrat
Landry, T
10
Democrat
Williams, A.
5
Democrat

Note that the only “perfect” score came from one of only two rookies, Rep. Barry Ivey. Not surprisingly, the second-highest Democrat is found only after 35 Republicans (and a no-party member) precede him, while 34 Democrats are below the lowest-scoring Republicans. But overall, at a score of 45.71 this was (barely) the lowest-scoring House since the ratings began in 2004, bringing the decade-long average down to 51.92. While the Republican average of 59.85 was their lowest ever (decade average of 68.30), it was only the second-lowest ever for Democrats at 27.41 (decade average of 37.29). The partisan gap of 31.08 actually was over a point lower than the decade average.

And now for the Senate:
Riser
90
Republican
Appel
70
Republican
Crowe
70
Republican
Donahue
70
Republican
Johns
70
Republican
Peacock
70
Republican
Walsworth
70
Republican
Claitor
65
Republican
Perry
65
Republican
Smith, J
63
Republican
Morrish
60
Republican
Long
56
Republican
Adley
55
Republican
Cortez
55
Republican
Smith, G
55
Democrat
Allain
50
Republican
Guillory, E
50
Republican
Martiny
50
Republican
White
50
Republican
Chabert
45
Republican
Mills
45
Republican
Nevers
45
Democrat
Alario
40
Republican
LaFleur
36
Democrat
Amedee
35
Republican
Buffington
35
Republican
Gallot
35
Democrat
Kostelka
35
Republican
Peterson
35
Democrat
Thompson
35
Democrat
Brown, Troy
33
Democrat
Tarver
30
Democrat
Ward
30
Democrat
Morrell
29
Democrat
Broome
25
Democrat
Dorsey-Colomb
25
Democrat
Erdey
15
Republican
Heitmeier
15
Democrat
Murray
5
Democrat

Again, the distribution is not very noteworthy, with 14 Republicans preceding the first Democrat in terms of high value of score, although GOP Sen. Dale Erdey showed himself to be a real outlier by tying for the second-lowest score. The average of 46.43 also was a little below the decade average of 49.25, with Republicans averaging 55.12 (decade average of 60.66) and Democrats averaging 30.90 (decade average 39.34). This produced a partisan gap of 24.22, about three points above the decade norm.

Regarding the Legislature as a whole, the more liberal/populist tone of the House while not typical also is not unusual over the past decade, although the -0.72 gap House-to-Senate in absolute terms was the smallest ever. The overall 45.90 average was the third-lowest ever, well below the decade norm of 51.23. As a whole, Republicans averaged 58.42 (decade average of 66.16) and Democrats averaged 28.24 (decade average of 37.97) for a partisan gap of 30.18, about two points above the decade norm.

Finally, in evaluating Gov. Bobby Jindal, since HB 111, HB 233, SB 117, and SB 259 never made it to his desk, and that HB 532 and HB 533 are constitutional amendment propositions that the governor does not deal with, his score is computed without these, which does magnify the impact of the remaining votes for score computation. And turned out to be by far the least conservative/reform of his six years at score of 46 . Of course, no doubt he had a hand in stopping liberal/populist legislation form ever getting to him or even coming to a vote, and he did stop a retrenchment of ethics standards, but when allowing higher salaries for local officials, approving of a useless if not counterproductive restriction on employment, and allowing for reduction of a tax credit bonus for acting as tax collector for the state, this pushed his decisions on recorded matters into the slightly liberal/populist camp.

No comments: