Written by the author of the blog "Between The Lines," Louisiana State University Shreveport political science professor Jeffrey D. Sadow, this blog provides commentary on actions of the Louisiana Legislature during its sessions, and even a little in between them. Check daily when the Legislature meets to find out the good, the bad, and the ugly of its legislative process with special guest appearances by various state elected executives.
29 April 2017
Legislative regular session through Apr. 29, 2017
Bill filing has ended, so for now on the only
additions will come from bills that, through amendments, have mutated into
something positive or negative. Removals can come from the same cause. Some
bills may change from one number to another through substitution.
THIS WEEK FOR THE GOOD: HB 6
passed House committee; HB 82
passed the House; HB 135 was substituted by HB 676; HB 245
passed House committee; HB 351
passed House committee; HB 676 passed House committee; SB 11 with
minor amendment passed Senate committee.
THIS WEEK FOR THE BAD: HB 497
with minor amendment passed House committee; HB 544
with minor amendment passed House committee; SB 71
passed Senate committee and the Senate; SB 142
passed Senate committee.
26 April 2017
Committee action, Apr. 26: HB 245, HB 6
DID YOU KNOW?
HB 245 by Rep. Frank Hoffman would have home- and community-based providers to not pay or to recoup background check fees from applicants. Hoffman told the House and Welfare Committee that the state believes providers already can recoup fees, but better to exempt them and allow the opportunity to collect fees, if not at the time after employment of the applicant. About half of all applicants fail such checks, so he thought it appropriate to exempt fees to prevent such a burden placed upon agencies that deal with waiver programs.
Without objection, the bill moved favorably.
DID YOU KNOW?
HB 6 by Rep. Paul Hollis would direct the state to adopt policies to relieve burdensome financial regulatory portions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to businesses and individuals. He told the House Insurance Committee of the bill’s consistency with an executive order issued by Pres. Donald Trump, and it likely would mean getting rid of the individual mandate.
Rep. Vincent Pierre
asked whether this could be done legally. Chairman Kirk Talbot
said anything could be done legally. Hollis said any constitutional challenge
could be defended.
Opponents declared that to implement this law
would have fewer people insured, without the penalty, and alleged health
outcomes would worsen, and said it was too risky constitutionally. It also
might create confusion, they argued.
Talbot pointed out the penalty represented a new
form of taxation, mandating payment simply for being alive, rather than
government imposing a regulation on the action of somebody. He also noted that
the Constitution vested powers of this sort in the states. Rep. Mark Abraham
argued that the system was broken, and change had to occur for things to
improve regardless of problems that could happen as a result of getting rid of
penalties. Rep. Greg
Cromer said the system already caused confusion and was unstable, so the
bill would not make matters worse.
Rep. Edmond Jordan
said the impact would not be known given uncertainty of the policy direction
nationally. Hollis noted the executive order gave some legitimacy to this move,
although Edmond claimed the taxing power of Congress would conflict with that –
even though former Pres, Barack Obama had used executive authority not to
implement portions of the law in the past, just as Hollis’ bill would permit.
Jordan objected to favorable passage, then the
bill was moved favorably by a 9-4 vote, with all Republicans present voting in
favor joined by a couple of Democrats while all opposition came from Democrats.
HB 245 by Rep. Frank Hoffman would have home- and community-based providers to not pay or to recoup background check fees from applicants. Hoffman told the House and Welfare Committee that the state believes providers already can recoup fees, but better to exempt them and allow the opportunity to collect fees, if not at the time after employment of the applicant. About half of all applicants fail such checks, so he thought it appropriate to exempt fees to prevent such a burden placed upon agencies that deal with waiver programs.
HB 6 by Rep. Paul Hollis would direct the state to adopt policies to relieve burdensome financial regulatory portions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to businesses and individuals. He told the House Insurance Committee of the bill’s consistency with an executive order issued by Pres. Donald Trump, and it likely would mean getting rid of the individual mandate.
23 April 2017
Legislative regular session through Apr. 22, 2017
Bill filing came to an end this week, with these
additions to the list of the good and bad (note: bills that did not have an
obvious positive or negative affect on tax burdens are not included, but as
these become known may be added to the list):
THE GOOD:
HB 652
by Rep. Chris
Broadwater would simplify sales taxation with lower rates; SB 243 by
Sen. Barrow
Peacock would rein the alternative fuel conversion tax credit.
THE BAD:
HB 628
by Rep. Sam
Jones would institute a gross receipts tax; HB 630 by
Rep. Ted James
would get rid of deductibility of federal tax burden on state income taxes; HB 632 by
Rep. Steve
Carter would increase gasoline taxes (similar bill: HB 659); HB 637 by
Rep. Lance
Harris would permit greater subsidization of insurance for high-risk
properties; HB
638 by Jones would continue the extra cent on sales tax another five years;
HB 647
by Rep. Kenny
Havard would institute an oil processing tax; HB 650 by
Broadwater would increase taxes on those individuals who pay the most; HB 654 by
Rep. Gene
Reynolds would increase insurance rates; HB 655 by
Reynolds would broaden sales tax reduction without corresponding rate
reduction; HB
656 by Rep. Rob
Shadoin would increase property taxes to fund the Taylor Opportunity
Program for Scholars; HB 667 by
Rep. Cedric Glover
creates an unneeded taxing authority over Shreveport; HB 672 by
Rep. Joe Stagni
would impose a fee discriminatorily on rideshare companies; SB 249 by
Sen. Norby Chabert
would fragment allocations going to coastal restoration and protection.
17 April 2017
Committee action, Apr. 17: SB 18, SB 25, SB 33
DID YOU KNOW?
SB 18 by Sen. Barrow Peacock would eliminate the alternative fuel conversion credit for vehicles. He told the Senate Revenue Committee that the money given away, 36 percent currently but due to go to 50 percent next year, the most generous in the country, would cost nearly $17 million over five years. He pointed out that even if it provided an incentive for cleaner air, this was quite costly to the state and that many conversions would occur anyway. In response to questions, he noted that in tight budgetary times the costs of this exceeded benefits.
A few senators insisted that the costs were worth it,
and Sen. Eddie Lambert said he would like to retain some form of this, if
perhaps at a lower level. After a promise to bring up the bill again soon in
order to confer with other senators on the item, Peacock somewhat hesitantly
agreed to defer.
DID YOU KNOW?
SB 18 by Sen. Barrow Peacock would eliminate the alternative fuel conversion credit for vehicles. He told the Senate Revenue Committee that the money given away, 36 percent currently but due to go to 50 percent next year, the most generous in the country, would cost nearly $17 million over five years. He pointed out that even if it provided an incentive for cleaner air, this was quite costly to the state and that many conversions would occur anyway. In response to questions, he noted that in tight budgetary times the costs of this exceeded benefits.
15 April 2017
Legislative regular session through Apr. 15, 2017
Bill filing continues for a short period, and adds
to the list of the good, bad, and ugly bills of the 2017 Regular session.
Otherwise, as is typical, few bills are heard and fewer still move in the first
week of these sessions.
THE GOOD:
HB 622
by Rep. Stephanie
Hilferty would remove excessing revenue-raising authority from the Ernest
N. Morial-New Orleans Exhibition Hall Authority.
SCORECARD
09 April 2017
The Good, Bad, and Ugly -- 2017 Regular Session
The Louisiana Legislature Log returns for the 2017
Regular Session of the Louisiana Legislature, beginning with exposition of the
good, and, and ugly bills prefiled for this year. Keep in mind that bills
regarding specific budgeting are not included. Note also that a number of
revenue bills tied into others which, if separate, would raise or lower total
taxes but tied in may have other effects. An opinion was rendered only on those
that, either designed to stand alone or in conjunction with others, that either
increased or decreased taxes unambiguously. As the session proceeds, some
others may be added as amendments make relationships clearer, or be removed.
THE GOOD:
HB 6 by
Rep. Paul
Hollis would initiate the process to provide financial relief for those not
wishing to buy health insurance; HB 68 by
Rep. Barry Ivey
would allow unlicensed law-abiding citizens to carry concealed firearms; HB 80 by
Rep. Stephanie
Hilferty would phase out the corporate franchise tax (similar bills: HB 361,
HB 433); HB
82 by Rep. Sherman
Mack would encourage more efficient use of indigent defense funds; HB 113 by
Rep. Chris
Broadwater would maintain higher education governing boards’ ability to set
fees; HB
117 by Rep. Franklin
Foil would raise grade point average standards for the Taylor Opportunity
Program for Students (similar bill: HB 194); HB 135 by Valarie Hodges
would prohibit sanctuary policies; HB 143 by
Rep. Dee Richard
would eliminate Tulane University scholarships given away by state legislators;
HB 152
by Rep. Tony
Bacala would create more efficient and better service provision for people
with disabilities; HB 187 by
Rep. Greg Cromer
would end the solar energy tax credit early (similar bills: HB 301, HB 331); HB 245 by
Rep. Frank
Hoffman would improve the quality of waiver services care; HB 256 by
Rep. Rick
Edmonds would amend the Constitution to prohibit felons for 15 years
without a pardon for five and other violent criminals for five years from
running for elective office or appointment (similar bill: HB 351); HB 257 by
Hollis would amend the Constitution to prohibit traffic camera enforcement; HB 272 by
Hollis would create a more realistic recall procedure; HB 275 by
Rep. Katrina
Jackson would repeal a cent of sales tax a year early; HB 294 by
Bacala would ensure more taxes raised on vehicles would go to roads projects; HB 302 by
Rep. Lance
Harris would encourage greater personal responsibility by those on
probation; HB
330 by Rep. Cameron Henry would amend the Constitution to distribute
Minimum Foundation Program funds more equitably; HB 337 by
Rep. Julie
Stokes would provide a tax credit for improvements made to the residences
of individuals with certain disabilities; HB 355 by
Ivey would accomplish comprehensive tax reform with a flat rate and elimination
of many exceptions (similar bills: HB 360, HB 370, HB 371); HB 385 by
Broadwater would repeal corporate income and franchise taxes and eliminate related
tax credits; HB
441 by Rep. Robbie
Carter would amend the Constitution to eliminate revenue sharing over a
decade (similar bill: HB 457); HB 442 by
Rep. Bob
Hensgens would amend the Constitution to cap appropriations annually with a
growth factor with excess funds eventually available to taxpayers (similar bill:
HB 477); HB
449 by Rep. Neil
Abramson would amend the Constitution not to allow tax exemption to
nonprofits’ property not in use; HB 518 by
Edmonds would try to make reviews of efficacy of funds and dedications (similar
bill: HB 590); HB 543 by
Rep. Beryl
Amedee would eliminate the state as teacher union dues collector; HB 556 by Rep.
Kevin Pearson
would discourage fraudulent claims of disability by school personnel; HB 564 by
Rep. Jay Morris
reduces corporate income taxes; HB 565 by
Jay Morris would increase ballot security; HB 588 by
Jay Morris would divert proceeds from less useful dedicated funds into the
general fund; HB 601 by
Stokes would create uniformity in sales tax administration; SB 11 by
Sen. Barrow
Peacock would incorporate the Louisiana School Employees' Retirement System
into the Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana; SB 40 by
Sen. Jay Luneau
ends the Motion Picture Investors Tax Credit (similar bill: SB 78); SB 51 by
Peacock would give a tax credit on franchise taxes paid in other states; SB 62 by
Sen. Bret Allain
would amend the Constitution to phase out the inventory tax over ten years; SB 67 by
Sen. Jim Fannin
would encourage audit compliance; SB 98 by Sen.
Jack Donahue
would improve budgetary decision-making (similar bill: SB 100); SB 111 by
Sen. Beth Mizell
would increase protections against criminal sexual exploitation; SB 130 by
Allain would amend the Constitution to phase out the inventory tax and reduce
the industrial property tax exemption related to school funding; SB 136 by
Sen. Rick Ward
would make some less-useful tax credits nonrefundable (similar bill: SB 161); SB 144 by
Sen. Ronnie Johns
would help combat human trafficking; SB 186 by
Ward would flatten rates and remove exemptions for individual income taxation; SB 188 by Sen. Sharon Hewitt
would introduce work requirements or equivalents for able-bodied working-age
adults receiving Medicaid; SB 198 by
Mizell would have the state vet relocation of monuments of historical
importance; SB
226 by Hewitt discards low-priority dedications and transfers their funds
balances to the general fund (similar bill: HB 458).
THE BAD:
HB 15
by Rep. Ted
James would impair the rights of individuals to form a municipality by
allowing nonresidents to veto their desires; HB 34 by
Rep. Steve Pugh
would consolidate higher education governance boards, but in a half-baked and
incomplete way; HB 36 by
Rep. Sam Jones
would encourage early retirements from jobs covered by state pensions to seek
elected office; HB 54 by Robbie
Carter would induce a tax increase on hydrocarbons that would reduce jobs and
be passed along to consumers (similar bills: HB 55, HB 60, HB 169); HB 67 by
Rep. Barbara
Norton would create an unenforceable ban targeting only one type of
firearm; HB
91 by Foil would create too much inflexibility in funding TOPS; HB 101 by
Rep. Terry
Landry would increase violent crime by removing capital punishment as a
deterrent (similar bill: SB 142); HB 103 by
Rep. Walt Leger
would discourage work productivity by increasing the Earned Income Tax Credit
(similar bill: HB 175); HB 112 by
Rep. Joseph
Bouie would introduce needless bureaucracy onto government contractors over
a nonexistent equal pay issue (similar bills: SB 2; HB 384); HB 118 by Hoffman
would raise tobacco taxes but not dedicate these to health care spending
(similar bill: HB 271); HB 139 by
Rep. Jack
McFarland would restrict unduly executive branch discretion; HB 157 by
Rep. Randal
Gaines would encourage politicized enforcement of public records laws; HB 163 by
Rep. Malinda
White would raise needlessly individual income taxes (similar bills: HB 197,
HB 254, HB 258, HB 312, HB 347, HB 349, HB 350, HB 353, HB 462); HB 170 by
Robbie Carter would remove the horizontal drilling tax exemption; HB 174 by Jackson
would continue penalizing Louisianans for income earned in other states
(similar bill: SB 33); HB 176 by
Rep. Rodney
Lyons would increase the cap of state money going to Councils on Aging; HB 177 by
Rep. Helena
Moreno would decrease crime deterrence; HB 181 by
Robbie Carter would add another unproductive carve-out for property taxation; HB 202 by
Rep. Mark
Abraham would discourage school choice (similar bill: HB 434; HB 546); HB 228 by
Rep. Pat Smith
would complicate needlessly the reapportionment process; HB 229 by
Smith would decrease deterrence of crime (similar bill: HB 235); HB 239 by
Bouie would create busywork for charter schools that does not enhance
accountability; HB 247 by
Jackson would increase permanently and needlessly corporate income taxes
(similar bills: HB 274, SB 79); HB 249 by
Rep. Tanner
Magee would decrease use of monetary inducements to deter crime; HB 255 by
Rep. Gary
Carter would raid unwisely the Budget Stabilization Fund; HB 282 by
Norton would create needless bureaucracy and disincentives for business; HB 333 by
Rep. Patrick
Jefferson would induce too much hardship on tax filing individuals and too much
bureaucracy to compensate; HB 406 by
Rep. Marcus
Hunter would increase costs needlessly by adding two Supreme Court
districts; HB
413 by Leger would provide too little flexibility in funding indigent
defense; HB
429 by Rep. Steve
Pylant would pay work-release inmates more than minimum wage; HB 443 by
Stokes would decrease legislative budgetary flexibility with an inspector
general dedication; HB 453 by
Abramson would increase needlessly costs of notaries public; HB 454 by
Abramson would keep an unneeded tax exception; HB 484 by
James would continue the extra one cent on sales taxation; HB 497 by
Norton would prohibit corporal punishment in schools; HB 544 by
Rep. Mike
Danahay does not guarantee adequate information solicited in voter
registration forms; HB 553 by
Jones would increase needless fuel taxes (similar bill: HB 561, HB 578, HB 600);
HB 563
by Jones would institute a gross receipts tax on corporations; HB 570 by
Richard would create too much inflexibility in governance by mandating contract
reductions; HB
585 by Jay Morris would create an unneeded dedication for higher education;
SB 13
by Sen. Blade
Morrish would restrict some lower-income households from exercising school
choice for kindergartners; SB 24 by
Sen. JP Morrell
would carve another unnecessary exemption into state sales taxation (similar
bill: SB 27); SB 25 by
Morrell would discourage school choice options (similar bill: SB 95); SB 71 by Donahue
would discourage TOPS reform away from entitlement status (similar bills: HB
390, SB 157); SB 73 by
Sen. John
Milkovich would dilute educational standards and accountability (similar
bills: HB 532, HB 536; HB 572); SB 83 by
Sen. Regina Barrow
foists an unneeded hotel occupancy tax hike on much of East Baton Rouge Parish;
SB 106
by Sen. Wesley
Bishop would distract higher education with social service duties; SB 110 by
Luneau would create unenforceable standards regarding TOPS; SB 118 by
Sen. Yvonne Colomb
would create incentives to occupy flood-prone housing; SB 139 by
Sen. Danny Martiny
would weaken too much crime deterrence; SB 153 by
Sen. Troy Carter
would increase the minimum wage and unemployment; SB 155 by
Troy Carter would regulate needlessly business personnel practices; SB 166 by
Morrell ends some more useful tax exemptions (similar bill: SB 206); SB 167 by
Barrow forces unnecessary costs upon air quality standard violators (similar
bill: HB 394); SB 235 by
Morrell keeps too inflated the Motion Picture Investor Tax Credit.
THE UGLY:
HB 12
by Mack would award generous pay to part-time planning commission members in
Livingston Parish – why pay for what is clearly meant as a voluntary position
in this one place; HB 52 by
Rep. Patrick
Connick would create another special dedication when too many exist
already; HB
142 by Pugh would create a one-shot special election day for constitutional
amendments – what’s wrong with the usual election day; HB 207 by
Rep. Gary
Carter would create a dual officeholding exception for health care providers
on faculty or staff of a public higher education institution – why.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)