HB 327
by Rep. Dee
Richard would eliminate 10 percent of all funding to contracts. Treasurer John
Kennedy, as he had in the House, argued to the Senate Finance Committee that
with so many of them out there that surely some weren’t really needed, and gave
examples of some that seemed superfluous. He said some of them had been subject
to line-item vetoes but then had been wangled out of the executive branch.
Commissioner
of Administration Paul Rainwater testified that the total dollar amount of
contracts from state government had been reduced by over a quarter since Gov. Bobby
Jindal took office. He said an arbitrary cut of 10 percent would cause
problems especially for larger contracts. He noted that contractual agreements
with the federal government also constrained cuts of this nature. And, he said
the Administration was sensitive to the issue of end runs. He pointed out that
queries were handled all of the time about them.
A
couple of senators then peppered Kennedy with defenses of some of the contract
titles and amounts he had read out. Kennedy said they weren’t bogus, put
perhaps should not be priorities. Sen. Edwin
Murray said he thought the better approach was to vet by contract by the
Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget, as Kennedy had suggested be done on
a case-by-case basis.