03 April 2010

Legislative regular session through Apr. 3, 2010

Filing of bills has commenced again, which provides the week’s only action. None of the bills designated to date as good or bad were acted upon in any meaningful way in this abbreviated week.


Nonetheless, this week begins the weekly update of bill progress. I’m making a change in the way I count bills; now all bills considered as similar or companion bills to another will be counted separately.


THE GOOD:

HB 1247 by Rep. Frank Hoffman would prohibit health insurers from including elective abortion in any health care coverage.


THE UGLY:

HB 1235 by Rep. Austin Badon would allow cell phones to be used only in a hands-free configuration or for emergencies; the problem is not really with the idea but with impossible enforcement of a primary offense.


SCORECARD:

Total number of bills, House: 1247; total number of bills, Senate: 686.


Total number of good bills, House: 64; total number of good bills, Senate: 33.


Total number of bad bills, House: 29; total number of bad bills, Senate: 24.


Total House good bills heard in House committee: 0; total Senate good bills heard in Senate committee: 0.


Total House bad bills heard in House committee: 0; total Senate bad bills heard in Senate committee: 0.


Total House good bills passed by House committee: 0; total Senate good bills passed by Senate committee: 0.


Total House bad bills passed by House committee: 0; total Senate bad bills passed by Senate committee: 0.


Total House good bills approved by House: 0; total Senate good bills approved by Senate: 0.


Total House bad bills approved by House: 0; total Senate bad bills approved by Senate: 0.


Total House good bills heard in Senate committee: 0; total Senate good bills heard in House committee: 0.


Total House bad bills heard in Senate committee: 0; total Senate bad bills heard in House committee: 0.


Total House good bills approved by Senate committee: 0; total Senate good bills approved by House committee: 0

Total House bad bills approved by Senate committee: 0; total Senate bad bills approved by House committee: 0.


Total House good bills approved by Senate: 0; total Senate good bills approved by House: 0.


Total House bad bills approved by Senate: 0; total Senate bad bills approved by House: 0.


Total House good bills going to governor: 0; total Senate good bills going to governor: 0.


Total House bad bills going to governor: 0; total Senate bad bills going to governor: 0.


Total House good bills signed by governor/filed with Secretary of State: 0; total Senate good bills signed by governor/filed with Secretary of State: 0.


Total House bad bills signed by governor/filed with Secretary of State: 0; total Senate bad bills signed by governor/filed with Secretary of State: 0.

21 March 2010

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly -- Prefiled bills as of Mar. 20, 2010

Welcome to the 2010 edition of the Louisiana Legislative Log, starting with the marathon entry describing the good, bad, and ugly bills prefiled. These are bills that would make significant contributions or deductions to good public policy (others would marginally do either) or, as for the ugly, make you wonder why the Legislature would want to deal with them in the first place. Bill filing, however, will resume at the session’s start and go on for another three weeks or so. Let’s see what bills are worth tracking this session, so far.


THE GOOD:

HB 51 by Rep. Simone Champagne would amend the Constitution to apply term limits to all statewide-elected constitutional offices not already term-limited.

HB 59 by Rep. Franklin Foil would shorten by an hour on each end time the polls are open for elections.

HB 68 by Rep. Henry Burns would allow presence of licensed handguns in places of worship if authorized for security purposes.

HB 69 by Rep. Tony Ligi would amend the Constitution to prohibit paying the state-funded portion of a pension to a public official convicted of corrupt acts in performing public service. (Similar/companion bills: HB 72, HB 73, HB 143, HB 224, HB 228, SB 11, SB 12, SB 13)

HB 94 by Rep. Kirk Talbot would amend the Constitution to prohibit federal mandates to require health insurance purchasing or otherwise penalizing of individuals. (Similar/companion bill: SB 26).

HB 101 by Rep. Ricky Hardy would amend the Constitution to impose a three-term limit on judges, district attorneys, and sheriffs.

HB 186 by Hardy would increase academic standards students would have to maintain to participate in extracurricular activities.

HB 200 by Rep. Patrick Connick would prohibit government contracts going to firms that had as a principal somebody who did not contest guilt to a felony charge. (Similar/companion bills: HB 407, HB 718).

HB 240 by Rep. Mike Danahay would resolve the legal ambiguity surrounding Board of Ethics adjudication. (Similar/companion bills: HB 1143, HB 1178, SB 310).

HB 247 by Rep. Hunter Greene would eliminate the requirement of Acts of the Legislature be printed in an official paper journal. (Similar/companion bill: HB 248; HB 765, HB 789).

HB 270 by Rep. Dee Richard would allow institutions of higher education to charge more tuition above the 12 hours per semester or equivalent level.

HB 302 by Rep. Mert Smiley would expand disclosure requirements for members of boards and commissions statewide.

HB 392 by Hardy would prohibit “double-dipping” by state and local government retirees.

HB 401 by Rep. Joe Harrison would increase the flexibility of public postsecondary institutions in setting tuition and fees (Similar/companion bills: HB 1012, SB 345, SB 347).

HB 409 by Harrison would require term limits for school board members. (Similar/companion bills: HB 410).

HB 415 by Rep. John LaBruzzo would require that every baccalaureate degree program in public universities have a course covering the U.S. Constitution.

HB 450 by Foil repeals licensure requirements for retail florists.

HB 490 by Harrison would create lower reimbursement levels for tuition for TOPS recipients. (Similar/companion bill: SB 86).

HB 532 by Rep. Nick Lorusso would increase transparency of nonprofits that receive public funds.

HB 556 by Rep. Ernest Wooton would increase safety by permitting all concealed weapons license carriers legally to carry such arms in zones now firearm-free.

HB 577 by Kevin Pearson would broaden the revenue base for property taxes without taxing the truly indigent.

HB 596 by Rep. Jim Morris would require a co-payment for Medicaid-billed services rendered for non-emergency services by emergency departments.

HB 611 by LaBruzzo would test for illegal drugs recipients of cash assistance. (Similar companion bill: HB 617).

HB 743 by Rep. Cameron Henry would amend the Constitution to abolish the lieutenant governorship and transfer its functions elsewhere. (Similar/companion bill: HB 812, SB 604).

HB 767 by Speaker Jim Tucker would amend the Constitution to remove legislative approval of tuition and fee increases.

HB 779 by Pearson closes loopholes and attenuates sweetheart deals from taxpayers going to fund activities of the association of racehorse owners. (Similar/companion bills: HB 827, HB 1208, SB 354).

HB 905 by Rep. Harrison would increase TOPS qualifying standards.

HB 930 by Tucker would mandate new hires into state employment be entered into a defined contribution plan. (Similar/companion bill: HB 931).

HB 958 by Ligi would create a fairer system of computing defined benefit retirement payments.

HB 959 by Rep. Walker Hines potentially would create a fairer system of judging resource allocation for recipients of long-term health care through Medicaid.

HB 962 by Rep. Steven Carter would prevent obstinacy by local school boards from discouraging charter school applications.

HB 969 by Pearson would require school board members have a high school diploma or equivalency and be residents of the parish in which they would serve for a minimum of two years.

HB 996 by Tucker would consolidate higher education governance boards. (Similar/companion bill: HB 1224).

HB 1075 by Rep. Jim Fannin would have agencies report on their contracts let.

HB 1101 by Rep. John Schroder would prohibit appropriations to nongovernmental entities in times of forecast budgetary deficit.

HB 1171 by Tucker would grant broad authority to postsecondary institutions of higher learning if they achieve certain performance standards in the areas of tuition and retention of funding. (Similar/companion bill: SB 570).

HB 1179 by Ligi would allow the Board of Ethics to appeal certain decisions made by an Ethics Adjudication Board. (Similar/companion bill: HB 1202).

HB 1205 by Harrison would ensure that public benefits go only to those noncitizens that legally qualify for them.

HB 1212 by Rep. Jeff Arnold would allow local governments to publish official journals electronically and not required to do so in print.

HB 1226 by Smiley would abolish needless boards and commissions.

HB 1229 by Tucker would save resources by combining the governing boards of the major pension funds in the state.

SB 6 by Sen. A.G. Crowe would amend the Constitution to grant greater discretion to the governor to make budget cuts. (Similar/companion bills: HB 322, 352; SB 7, SB 391, SB 392; SB 463, SB 623).

SB 9 by Sen. Butch Gautreaux would make texting while driving illegal.

SB 78 by Crowe would amend the Constitution to extend civil liberties to unborn human beings

SB 164 by Sen. Edwin Murray would close a loophole that prohibited Louisiana wineries from shipping wine intrastate which put them at a competitive disadvantage.

SB 185 by Sen. Nick Gautreaux would amend the Constitution to prevent unpardoned felons convicted in other states or countries from qualifying for elective office.

SB 186 by Nick Gautreaux would amend the Constitution so that no tax by a local governing authority can pass without at least a third of registered voters vote in that election.

SB 332 by Sen. Troy Hebert would allow for a referendum process for state laws.

SB 348 by Sen. Rob Marionneaux would help breathing-impaired individuals by banning smoking in bars and gaming areas. (Similar/companion bill: SB 334).

SB 455 by Sen. Jack Donahue would sunset many dedicated funds in a couple of years which would require their review and reauthorization to continue.

SB 471 by Sen. Mike Michot would create a savings account for health care expenditures.

SB 521 by Sen. Buddy Shaw would clarify that only married couples as defined by the Louisiana Constitution or single individuals can be listed as parents on an amended adoptive birth certificate.

SB 534 by Hebert would apply Second Amendment freedoms to certain state areas.

SB 549 by Sen. Robert Adley would restrict law school clinics to prosecuting and defending criminal cases, representation in state juvenile court, and raising some constitutional challenges.

SB 550 by Sen. Mike Walsworth would protect absentee ballot security by requiring nonfamily members to bring only single ballots if hand delivered and to sign statements.

SB 606 by Sen. Danny Martiny would safeguard religious freedoms.

SB 608 by Sen. Dan Claitor would clarify federal nomination and general election procedures that would not force the state to spend much money in having primaries for non-major political parties.


THE BAD:

HB 157 by Greene would hinder a governor’s ability to receive information about bills in pondering a veto by requiring agencies to notify the bill’s author of a request for a veto on their part.

HB 251 by Rep. Pat Smith would needlessly restrict choice for state superintendant.

HB 274 by Rep. Rogers Pope would mandate passing along stipends to nationally certified school employees as an obligation of state taxpayers regardless of the district in which the educators are employed. (Similar/companion bill: SB 489).

HB 292 by Greene would abandon the closed primary system for federal elections in favor of the blanket primary system.

HB 344 by Rep. Michael Jackson would discourage use of credit cards for payments except for government agencies.

HB 367 by Rep. Herbert Dixon would increase fees for applying for drivers’ licenses by a minimum of $2. (Similar/companion bill: HB 379).

HB 384 by Rep. Jack Montoucet would amend the Constitution to allow increased politicization of public safety forces.

HB 470 by Hardy would amend the Constitution to limit electoral choices of voters to people under 70.

HB 487 by Harrison would create a potentially politically-unworkable situation by mandating that the lieutenant governor serve as commissioner of administration.

HB 529 by Smith would mandate rather than make optional school districts teaching sexual education.

HB 566 by Rep Neil Abramson would create more bureaucracy and cost to government without effectively increasing transparency in requiring officials to separately report about their appointees who contributed at least $1,000 to their campaigns.

HB 650 by Rep. John Bel Edwards would needlessly constrain statewide elected officials in announcing or qualifying for candidacies to other offices (except for political parties) by requiring they resign their current office.

HB 658 by Rep. Harold Ritchie would undercut greater autonomy given to charter schools by forcing their teachers into the state’s Teachers Retirement System of Louisiana. (Similar/companion bill: SB 274).

HB 673 by Rep. Barbara Norton would give the theoretically and empirically flawed “comparable worth” policy the force of law. (Similar/companion bills: HB 832, SB 249)

HB 732 by Norton would reduce disciplinary options by schools with the prohibiting of corporal punishment.

HB 799 by Rep. Eddie Lambert would restrict checks and balances by allowing a legislative veto of a governor’s call to extraordinary session by a two-thirds vote of each chamber. (Similar/companion bill: HB 800).

HB 820 by Abramson would amend the Constitution to create an even greater straitjacket on budgeting by protecting higher education and health care funding. (Similar/companion bills: HB 1035, HB 1140).

HB 901 by Rep. Walter Leger would create for adopted children confusion by allowing unmarried cohabitating adults both to become adoptive parents of the same child.

HB 988 by Hardy would place an unreasonable burden on TANF recipients by forcing them to vote.

HB 1068 by Rep. Austin Badon would write into law a definition of graduate/completer of higher education that needlessly constrains the concept when applied to policy in the area of higher education so that it may not contribute validly to discussions of that policy.

HB 1110 by Rep. Juan LaFonta would decrease flexibility in times of forecasted budgetary deficit. (Similar/companion bill: HB 1112).

SB 1 by Pres. Joel Chaisson would amend the Constitution to change scope of the Budget Stabilization Fund to be applied to changes in federal as well as state funds (Similar/companion bills: SB 2, HB 1109, HB 1111).

SB 23 by Sen. John Alario would further narrow the tax base by doubling the homestead exemption.

SB 101 by Butch Gautreaux would make private voting for chamber leaders which would create difficulties in effective leadership (Similar/companion bill: SB 102).

SB 109 by Sen. Francis Thompson would create an even greater budgetary straitjacket concerning timber severance taxes.

SB 122 by Adley would amend the Constitution to give an unprecedented criminal prosecution authority to the attorney general, in cases of felony violations of campaign finance laws. (Similar/companion bill: SB 259).

SB 154 by J.P. Morrell would expand vastly the power of government to expropriate for any reason.

SB 225 by Sen. Eric LaFleur would create an additional burden on the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries by making it register voters.

SB 254 by Nick Gautreaux would needlessly restrict local government options in leasing or purchasing vehicles by requiring they be hybrid fuel or alternative fuel.

SB 272 by Sen. Yvonne Dorsey would constrain unnecessarily the tax refund anticipation marketplace.

SB 333 by Hebert would discourage free speech through forcing campaign contributions into a quasi-public financing regime. (Similar/companion bill: SB 431).

SB 432 by Marionneaux would bring back the hydrocarbon processing tax that would discourage such business in the state.

SB 464 by Hebert would create a confusing means by which to have a contingent term limitation placed on statewide officials.

SB 490 by Sen. Ben Nevers would encourage dumbing down secondary education standards by exempting career diploma students from passing regular end-of-course exams.

SB 491 by Nevers would constrain budgeting by forcing at least 2.75% annual increases into the Minimum Foundation Program regardless of factors such as enrollments.

SB 492 by Nevers would attempt to discourage charter schools by putting the needless burden of financial disclosure as with some government officials on the members of their governing boards

SB 505 by Sen. Lydia Jackson would use taxpayer dollars to pay for expenses of enrollees at public universities for students who have not demonstrated ability to be successful at that level.

SB 566 by Dorsey would impose arbitrary demographic quota-like requirements on any firm receiving any state economic development funds.


THE UGLY:

HB 62 by Abramson would limit gubernatorial and candidate choices for the lieutenancy governorship by mandating appointees in the case of a vacancy in the office with more than a year to go in the term not run for election for the full term; what public interest is served by this? (Similar/companion bills: SB 33; SB 325, SB 369, SB 370).

HB 103 by Hardy would ban the wearing of saggy pants; why does the Legislature need to deal with this?

HB 467 by Pearson states any cable TV provider would have to offer as an option to subscribers channels that show publicly-funded professional sports franchises; why is government getting involved in such a picayunish thing?

HB 922 by Rep. Jonathan Perry would extend daylight savings time permanently in Louisiana; why be different from other states in this time zone?

HB 1054 by Norton would require an “African American section” in each public library; why must this be a mandate?

SB 128 by Adley would ban the sale of “energy drinks” to those under 16; so children can go drink as much coffee as they want but they can’t buy this?.

SB 250 by Dorsey declares the tea cake as the official state cookie; do we need to waste time on this?

SB 653 by Hebert would limit local voters’ choices by not allowing those appointed to fill vacancies in these offices to run for the next election for them; where’s the public interest in this?

18 July 2009

Legislative regular session wrap-up and rankings: Gov., 2009

And now, the final disposition of bills from the 2009 regular session of the Louisiana Legislature, as well as Gov. Bobby Jindal’s legislative scorecard.

THIS MONTH FOR THE GOOD: HB 148 was signed by the governor; HB 765 was filed with the Secretary of State; HB 902 was signed by the governor; SB 2 was signed by the governor; SB 195 was signed by the governor; SB 223 was signed by the governor; SB 267 was signed by the governor.

THIS MONTH FOR THE BAD: HB 179 was signed by the governor; HB 458 was signed by the governor; HB 538 was signed by the governor; HB 591 became law without the signature of the governor; HB 612 was signed by the governor; HB 855 was signed by the governor; HB 898 was signed by the governor; SB 43 was signed by the governor; SB 245 was vetoed by the governor; SB 256 was signed by the governor; SB 259 was signed by the governor; SB 277 was signed by the governor.

SCORECARD:
Total number of bills, House: 904; total number of bills, Senate: 351.

Total number of good bills, House: 34; total number of good bills, Senate: 18.

Total number of bad bills, House: 45; total number of bad bills, Senate: 20.

Total House good bills heard in House committee: 29; total Senate good bills heard in Senate committee: 12.

Total House bad bills heard in House committee: 39; total Senate bad bills heard in Senate committee: 14.

Total House good bills passed by House committee: 12; total Senate good bills passed by Senate committee: 9.

Total House bad bills passed by House committee: 14; total Senate bad bills passed by Senate committee: 8.

Total House good bills approved by House: 9; total Senate good bills approved by Senate: 8.

Total House bad bills approved by House: 10; total Senate bad bills approved by Senate: 8.

Total House good bills heard in Senate committee: 8; total Senate good bills heard in House committee: 8.

Total House bad bills heard in Senate committee: 9; total Senate bad bills heard in House committee: 7.

Total House good bills approved by Senate committee: 8; total Senate good bills approved by House committee: 7

Total House bad bills approved by Senate committee: 9; total Senate bad bills approved by House committee: 7

Total House good bills approved by Senate: 5; total Senate good bills approved by House: 7.

Total House bad bills approved by Senate: 8; total Senate bad bills approved by House: 6.

Total House good bills going to governor: 4; total Senate good bills going to governor: 4.

Total House bad bills going to governor: 7; total Senate bad bills going to governor: 6.

Total House good bills signed by governor/filed with Secretary of State: 4; total Senate good bills signed by governor/filed with Secretary of State: 4.

Total House bad bills signed by governor/filed with Secretary of State: 7; total Senate bad bills signed by governor/filed with Secretary of State: 5.

Jindal will be rated using on the one bill that was used in the House and Senate rankings that passed both bodies in identical form. Several others were chosen from among the other good and bad, with the following weighings:

HB 591 (10 percent) – relaxes lobbyist rules to allow groups of at least 10 legislators to get more food and drink paid for at certain events; a conservative/reform action is to veto

HB 612 (15 percent) – lowers graduation standards for some students; a conservative/reform action is to veto.

HB 898 (10 percent) – continues without end corporate welfare for the film industry; a conservative/reform action is to veto.

SB 2 (25 percent) – permits greater flexibility in budgetary deficit situations; a conservative/reform action is to allow it to become law.

SB 195 – (15 percent) – requires appointees to offices to report campaign contributions given to those who appointed them of $1,000 or greater; a conservative/reform action is to allow it to become law.

SB 223 (15 percent) – gives greater latitude for schools to remove disruptive students and notification of parents of that behavior; a conservative/reform action is to allow it to become law.

SB 267 (10 percent) – provides greater ability to transfer money among funds in a budgetary deficit situation; a conservative/reform action is to allow it to become law.

Jindal signed or allowed to become law without his signature all of these bills, thus he scored a 65, slightly more conservative/reformist than the House and much more than the Senate. It must be noted that because of the very different scales, however, these scores are not directly comparable.

Until next time, probably the next regular session, the Log signs off.

11 July 2009

Legislative regular session wrap-up and rankings: Senate, 2009

This week will be presented the scorecard for Senate members for the 2009 regular session. Senators will be graded on their votes on a bill which passed both chambers, one that passed the Senate but not the House, two which passed both chambers in different forms, and three which failed to pass the House only which are similar bills to those that failed to pass the Senate only. The highest score of 100 represents a perfect conservative/reform voting record, while the lowest score of 0 represents a perfect liberal/populist voting record. The seven bills and their weighings are:

HB 591 (10 percent) – would relax lobbyist rules to allow groups of at least 10 legislators to get more food and drink paid for at certain events; a conservative/reform vote is against.

HB 689 (25 percent) – would reverse tax deductions that began in 2009; a conservative/reform vote is against.

HB 340 (10 percent) – would strengthen religious freedoms in the state Constitution; a conservative/reform vote is for.

SB 183 (5 percent) – would allow universities to raise tuition and fees without requiring a two-thirds vote of the Legislature; a conservative/reform vote is for.

SB 335 (25 percent) – would reverse tax deductions that began in 2009; a conservative/reform vote is against.

SB 37 amendment #2343 (15 percent) – vote on an amendment for the bill which would have forced unelected tax authorities to put millage increases to a vote during regular state or federal elections before they took effect, which removed so many jurisdictions as to effectively moot the bill; a conservative/reform vote is against.

SB 186 (10 percent) – would have banned smoking in almost all commercial establishments that serve food; a conservative/reform vote is for.

(Since an absence is counted as a “no” vote, that also is reflected in these ranking unless the legislator asked for leave on the day of the vote. In that case, the vote if the overall vote was a defeat is removed from the ranking and the score adjusted to reflect only those votes that occurred when the legislator was not on leave. Votes on amendments, which have different passage rules, that are part of the rankings are adjusted for absences regardless of whether leave was taken.)

The Senate turned out much more liberal/populist than the house, with an average score of just under 37. Only eight senators even were above 50, and two of these were Democrats meaning 10 from the GOP scored below. A quintet of Republicans scored as high as 90 but no perfect scores were reached unlike in the House, but two perfect scores in the opposite were registered by Democrats, Lydia Jackson and Eric LaFleur. Some reversals were stunning in their scope as compared to last year among Republicans; swinging at least 30 points away from conservatism/reformism were, in order of magnitude, Danny Martiny, Blade Morrish, Sherri Smith Cheek, Julie Quinn, and (representing a drop from 70 to 25) Gerald Long, while swinging at least that much towards conservatism/reformism were, in order of magnitude, A.G. Crowe, Jack Donahue, and (representing a gain from 55 to 90), Buddy Shaw. Amazingly, last year’s (tied for) most liberal/populist Republican, Robert Adley, actually continued in that direction scoring just a 12 and ranking closer to this end than all but seven Democrats.

In sum, because the six that were above 50 scored well above it, the GOP average was still above 50 at about 57, while Democrats averaged around 26. Nick Gautreaux, a Democrat, and Republicans Mike Walsworth and Neil Riser were the only senators to score high this year as well as last, while making significant moves in the liberal/populist direction (moving down at least 30 points, in order of magnitude) were Francis Thompson, Jackson, Pres. Joel Chaisson, Reggie Dupre and, with an incredible 55 point drop, David Heitmeier.

Next week will feature the governor’s score and a wrapup on all bills. Here is the complete list of senators:

Appel 90 Republican
Crowe 90 Republican
Donahue 90 Republican
Shaw 90 Republican
Walsworth 90 Republican
Riser 85 Republican
Gautreaux, N 75 Democrat
Smith, J 65 Democrat
Alario 47 Democrat
Marionneaux 44 Democrat
Claitor 40 Republican
Hebert 40 Democrat
Kostelka 40 Republican
Gautreaux, B 30 Democrat
Mount 29 Democrat
Quinn 29 Republican
Cheek 25 Republican
Erdey 25 Republican
Long 25 Republican
Nevers 25 Democrat
Broome 24 Democrat
Amedee 20 Democrat
Duplessis 18 Democrat
Martiny 18 Republican
Morrish 18 Republican
Dorsey 15 Democrat
Gray Evans 15 Democrat
Guillory, E 15 Democrat
Michot 15 Republican
Morrell 15 Democrat
Thompson 15 Democrat
Adley 12 Republican
McPherson 10 Democrat
Chaisson 5 Democrat
Dupre 5 Democrat
Heitmeier 5 Democrat
Murray 5 Democrat
Jackson, L 0 Democrat
LaFleur 0 Democrat

06 July 2009

Legislative regular session wrap-up and rankings: House, 2009

This week will be presented the scorecard for House members for the 2009 regular session. Representatives will be graded on their votes on a bill which passed both chambers, one that passed the Senate but not the House, two which passed both chambers in different forms, and three which failed to pass the House only which are similar bills to those that failed to pass the Senate only. The highest score of 100 represents a perfect conservative/reform voting record, while the lowest score of 0 represents a perfect liberal/populist voting record. The seven bills and their weighings are:

HB 591 (10 percent) – would relax lobbyist rules to allow groups of at least 10 legislators to get more food and drink paid for at certain events; a conservative/reform vote is against.

HB 689 (25 percent) – would reverse tax deductions that began in 2009; a conservative/reform vote is against.

HB 340 (10 percent) – would strengthen religious freedoms in the state Constitution; a conservative/reform vote is for.

SB 183 (5 percent) – would allow universities to raise tuition and fees without requiring a two-thirds vote of the Legislature; a conservative/reform vote is for.

HB 889 (25 percent) – would raise taxes on tobacco; a conservative/reform vote is against.

HB 705 (15 percent) – would introduce by the law the comparable worth concept into how many private businesses in the state would have to base salaries; a conservative/reform vote is against.

HB 844 (10 percent) – would have banned smoking in almost all commercial establishments that serve food; a conservative/reform vote is for.

(Since an absence is counted as a “no” vote, that also is reflected in these ranking unless the legislator asked for leave on the day of the vote. In that case, the vote if the overall vote was a defeat is removed from the ranking and the score adjusted to reflect only those votes that occurred when the legislator was not on leave. Votes on amendments, which have different passage rules, that are part of the rankings are adjusted for absences regardless of whether leave was taken.)

The results were interesting for several reasons. First, unlike in past years the eligible range of bills was fairly narrow, due to a high incidence of legislation passing at least one house unanimously. Second, a huge gap opened between Republicans and Democrats, with the former averaging close to 80 and the latter just over 35 (even though three scored a remarkable 90, the highest ever for any Democrat), representing a huge ideological split in the body (the three independents, two of whom lean to the Republicans and one to the Democrats, averaged 56 2/3’s.) Third, while in past years rarely did any Republican score a 100 and no Democrat ever took home a 0, this time 3 from the GOP bagged perfect scores, and an amazing 10 Democrats scored perfectly in reverse.

As a whole, the body averaged around 57. Jim Fannin, Mickey Guillory, and Major Thibaut were the three high-scoring Democrats, and 16 others were above 50. At the very bottom were Elton Aubert, Jared Brossett, Roy Burrell, Herbert Dixon, A.B. Franklin, Rick Gallot, Rickey Hardy, Reed Henderson, Girod Jackson, and Patrick Williams. For Republicans, the three scoring perfectly were Tim Burns, Franklin Foil, and Hunter Greene. Only two of them scored below 50, Ernest Wooton and Hollis Downs.

Here is the complete list (recall that District 40 is vacant), to be followed by senators and the governor next week:

Burns, T 100 Republican
Foil 100 Republican
Greene 100 Republican
Burford 90 Republican
Cortez 90 Republican
Cromer 90 Republican
Dove 90 Republican
Fannin 90 Democrat
Guillory, M 90 Democrat
Hazel 90 Republican
Henry 90 Republican
Hutter 90 Republican
Kleckley 90 Republican
LaBruzzo 90 Republican
Monica 90 Republican
Pearson 90 Republican
Schroder 90 Republican
Thibaut 90 Democrat
Waddell 90 Republican
Morris 85 Republican
Perry 85 Republican
Pope 85 Republican
Smith, J 85 Republican
Talbot 85 Republican
Barras 80 Democrat
Billiot 80 Democrat
Burns, H 80 Republican
Connick 80 Republican
Guinn 80 Republican
Katz 80 Republican
Ligi 80 Republican
Little 80 Republican
Lopinto 80 Republican
McVea 80 Republican
Mills 80 Democrat
Nowlin 80 Republican
Ponti 80 Republican
Pugh 80 Republican
Richard 80 Independent
Richardson 80 Republican
Simon 80 Republican
Smiley 80 Republican
Tucker 80 Republican
Wilmott 80 Republican
Badon, B 75 Democrat
Carter 75 Republican
Champagne 75 Democrat
Chandler 75 Democrat
Geymann 75 Republican
Hoffman 75 Republican
Johnson 75 Democrat
Landry 75 Republican
Robideaux 75 Independent
White 75 Republican
Templet 70 Republican
Arnold 65 Democrat
Gisclair 65 Democrat
Armes 60 Democrat
Hill 60 Democrat
Hines 60 Democrat
Howard 60 Republican
Jones, S. 60 Democrat
Carmody 55 Republican
Danahay 55 Democrat
Ellington 55 Democrat
Ernst 55 Republican
Harrison 55 Republican
Lambert 55 Republican
Montoucet 55 Democrat
Roy 55 Democrat
Wooton 45 Republican
Baldone 40 Democrat
Downs 40 Republican
LeBas 40 Democrat
Abramson 35 Democrat
Chaney 30 Democrat
Doerge 30 Democrat
Smith, G 30 Democrat
Badon, A 25 Democrat
Barrow Ashford 20 Democrat
Stiaes 20 Democrat
Anders 15 Democrat
Jackson, M 15 Independent
LaFonta 15 Democrat
Leger 15 Democrat
Ritchie 15 Democrat
St. Germain 15 Democrat
Honey 10 Democrat
Jones, R. 10 Democrat
Norton 10 Democrat
Peterson 10 Democrat
Richmond 10 Democrat
Edwards 5 Democrat
Smith, P 5 Democrat
Aubert 0 Democrat
Brossett 0 Democrat
Burrell 0 Democrat
Dixon 0 Democrat
Franklin 0 Democrat
Gallot 0 Democrat
Hardy 0 Democrat
Henderson 0 Democrat
Jackson, G 0 Democrat
Williams 0 Democrat